Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa (2013)

86-year-old Irving Zisman takes a trip from Nebraska to North Carolina to take his 8 year-old grandson, Billy, back to his real father.

Director: 


Writers: 

(story), (story)

Stars:  





Story:

After the stereoscopic shit and spew of Jackass 3D, this stupefyingly unfunny dirge slumps into hackneyed Candid Camera territory, presenting a series of "skits" strung together with a narrative that commits the twin crimes of being both coarse and sentimental.
Johnny Knoxville dons the ageing makeup as Irving Zisman, an octogenarian widower with his wife's body in the trunk and grandson on the front seat of his car, roaming across America showing his rubbery scrotum to all and sundry. After 80 minutes of sub-Borat dick-jokes (and "jovial" harassment of women), we get a beauty pageant finale for which the makers of Little Miss Sunshine should sue. Secondhand gags, third-rate execution, fourth-rate results.
Perhaps in acknowledgment that they're getting too old for masochistic tomfoolery, the Jackass crew mix up the formula – by getting even older. Regulars will be familiar with Knoxville's Irving Zisman persona, and the theory that you can get away with anything if you're disguised as a lecherous, liver-spotted old coot is taken even further when Zisman reluctantly takes a road trip with his chubby nine-year-old grandson, with hidden-camera gags along the way. Sacha Baron Cohen's Borat set the bar very high for this type of narrative-driven prankery, and in comparison, Bad Grandpa comes across as disjointed and aimless. Having said that, some of the pranks are awfully funny, putting lewdness and prosthetic body parts in places they're really not supposed to go, such as funeral parlours, child beauty pageants and, most memorably, an Afro-American "ladies night".


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:


I think there are two different possible reviews, one for the mtv kids generation and one for the rest of the world. For the second ones it  will be a WhatShit, but most of the cinema-visitors are in the first group and so there is a .....






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Oct. 29, 2013: $37,760,052
Distributor: ParamountRelease Date: October 25, 2013
Genre: ComedyRuntime: 1 hrs. 33 min.
MPAA Rating: RProduction Budget: $15 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2 (2013)

Flint Lockwood now works at The Live Corp Company for his idol Chester V. But he's forced to leave his post when he learns that his most infamous machine is still operational and is churning out menacing food-animal hybrids.

Directors: 


Writers: 

(characters), (characters),

Stars: 

, , Will Forte




Story:


The bizarre animated hit from 2009 in which food rained from the sky as the edible apocalypse approached played out like the kind of kids' movie David Lynch would have made had he not been so busy fooling around with the animated segments of Eraserhead.
While this follow-up may lack the "WTF?!" head-scramble of its predecessor, it still gets a surprising amount of mileage out of the invention of "foodimals" – food/animal hybrids that roam the hallucinogenic landscape like the inhabitants of a snack-based Jurassic Park. Never smile at a Taco-dile! Don't step on that Apple Pie-thon! Keep out of the way of the Hippotato! If you don't find those puns funny, then there's nothing for you here – certainly not in terms of coherent narrative. But for anyone wishing to tickle the tummy-buns of a Double Bacon Cheespider, there's a menagerie of colourful mutants to distract your attention from the absence of anything more substantial.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:

An animation movie for kids and for all young-at-heart. If you like word-plays and you dont take the movie too serious you will have much fun during the show. A film dont have to be always full of action and fast cuts, much blood and many explosions, sometimes you get the right relexation in a cartoon-movie, so my suggestion is.....






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Oct. 29, 2013: $101,400,992
Distributor: Sony / ColumbiaRelease Date: September 27, 2013
Genre: AnimationRuntime: 1 hrs. 35 min.
MPAA Rating: PGProduction Budget: $78 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Gravity (2013)

A medical engineer and an astronaut work together to survive after an accident leaves them adrift in space.

Director:  


Writers: 


Stars: 





Story:


Spare a thought for the hapless delegates on day one of the Venice film festival. They're scanning the schedule, colliding on the stairwell and clearly struggling to find their feet and get their bearings. The opening movie offers no comfort at all. When the lights go down inside the cinema, the viewers are pitched, without further ado, clean out to the cosmos. All at once their nearest neighbour in the adjoining seat might as well be a thousand miles away.
Gravity, by the Mexican director Alfonso Cuarón is a brilliantly tense and involving account of two stricken astronauts; a howl in the wilderness that sucks the breath from your lungs. Sandra Bullock and George Clooney star as Stone and Kowalsky, the skittish newcomer and the wily old pro, who find themselves battered by the drifting debris from a Russian satellite. Their shuttle is holed and useless, its interior full of floating corpses, and Houston steadfastly refuses to copy. Stone and Kowalsky's only hope is make their way across the void to the international space station and possible salvation. But they're lost in the desert, wafting in orbit; each spinning and turning as they grope despairingly for the hand of a friend.
Across the void ... A still from Gravity. Photograph: Universal Pictures/Allstar It could be claimed that Cuarón has thrown a similar lifeline to the Venice film festival, which last year got off to a stuttering start courtesy of Mira Nair's well-meaning yet half-baked The Reluctant Fundamentalist. Gravity provides an altogether more assured curtain-raiser. It comes blowing in from the ether like some weightless black nightmare, hanging planet Earth at crazy angles behind the action. Like Tarkovsky's Solaris (later remade by Clooney and director Steven Soderbergh), the film thrums with an ongoing existential dread. And yet, tellingly, Cuaron's film contains a top-note of compassion that strays at times towards outright sentimentality. Stone, we learn, is haunted by the death of her infant daughter. She has scant seconds to decide whether she wants to live or die.
'The skittish newcomer and the wily old pro' ... Sandra Bullock and George Clooney in Gravity Maybe it's fitting that a film about two lonely figures adrift in outer-space should itself be dominated by the cosmos. Clooney and Bullock give dogged, decent performances here, but they are inevitably shouting to be heard; utterly at the mercy of forces beyond their control. Cuaron takes the two stars and stitches them against a vast canvas of roaring sound design and terrifying 3D visuals. Ruined satellites pitch and yaw. Shrapnel zips through the darkness like shoals of silver fish. As the screening wraps up, the delegates are politely instructed to return their spectacles to an usher and not leave them on the seat. Gravity, after all, offers a stark warning of the dangers of debris, clutter and human waste. With a little good fortune, even the 3D glasses will eventually find their way back home.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:


Great pictures from the earth and the cosmos ist not enough for an interesting and recommendable movie. The story line is far-fetched, so many accidents, so much bad luck is not even beliveable in a cinema movie. Two stars for the great pictures, but all in all ....






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Oct. 9, 2013: $73,788,739
Distributor: Warner Bros.Release Date: October 4, 2013
Genre: Sci-Fi ThrillerRuntime: 1 hrs. 31 min.
MPAA Rating: PG-13Production Budget: $100 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com

Saturday, October 5, 2013

Prisoners (2013)

When Keller Dover's daughter and her friend go missing, he takes matters into his own hands as the police pursue multiple leads and the pressure mounts. But just how far will this desperate father go to protect his family?

Director: 


Writer: 


Stars: 



Story:

Canadian director Denis Villeneuve is known and admired for his 2010 movie Incendies, a mysterious and involved tale that I thought worked as a kind of prose-poem about memory and identity, and about how violence and bloodshed are the creator/parents of a traumatised future – but I wondered about its straightforward believability as drama. Now Villeneuve has made his first English-language film, Prisoners, a long, brutal and occasionally gripping forensic crime drama. Hugh Jackman stars as a man whose little daughter has been kidnapped; Jake Gyllenhaal is the cop assigned to the case, and Paul Dano is the disturbed individual who holds the key to the whole thing. This movie keeps plenty of suspects in play, along with multiple plotlines running and plates spinning. It all finally ties up – sort of. Prisoners is as involved and twisty as any airport bestseller: not an adaptation, though, but an original screenplay by the TV writer-producer Aaron Guzikowski.
It obviously aspires to something more than pulp, with the pluralities of meaning in the title. There are flashes of the macabre, which put me very briefly in mind of Jonathan Demme's The Silence of the Lambs (1991) or George Sluizer's The Vanishing (1993). The film gestures at agonised questions of guilt, crime and punishment: on the poster, the haggard and bearded Jackman has a Dostoevskian look that oddly does not come across in the movie itself. Perhaps most interestingly, Villeneuve and Guzikowski appear to be contriving some metaphors for the "war on terror"; some anxieties buried in the American psyche about just what is involved when interrogation is enhanced.
Jackman and Terrence Howard are Keller and Franklin, two middle-aged guys, who with their wives Grace (Maria Bello) and Nancy (Viola Davis), are forever having family get-togethers. After one boozy Thanksgiving lunch, the grownups let their two little girls play out on the street, close to where a creepy campervan is parked. When the two girls vanish, along with the sinister vehicle, a massive police hunt is directed by Detective Loki (Gyllenhaal), who is haunted by the case and perhaps, in the time-honoured manner, by his own personal demons. But on arresting the van's driver, the learning-impaired Alex Jones (Dano), there is still no sign of the girls and the man appears entirely unresponsive to ferocious questioning. With no legal grounds to hold him, and to general community outrage, Loki has to let the man go. In the brawl outside the station, Jones murmurs something to Keller. Could it be that he does know something – taunting the parents with riddles and clues?
Villeneuve is good at showing the nauseating excavation and archaeology involved here: vast areas are searched and sifted through. And when the investigation is as widespread and concerted as this, other horrors, long hidden, can be dredged up too. Loki has to contact and question all the known sex offenders in the locality, and his fanatical persistence seems to bring new atrocities to light. The discovery of a mouldering corpse, which may or may not have anything to do with the missing girls, appears to cause only an infinite weariness and distaste in Loki. He speaks to one woman whose little boy vanished without trace 20 years ago, and she seems almost resigned to tragedies like hers never getting solved: "No one took them; nothing happened; they're just gone."
Set against this nihilist despair is something else: rage. For the families, the girls' kidnapping appears to be an act of terrorism and something must be done. The idea that Jones actually does know something, and that pussyfooting law-enforcement officials are failing to get at the truth, is intolerable. The result is violence, and some horrible images that are closer to European hardcore than mainstream Hollywood.
But what exactly is the movie saying about all this? It could be that torture is always morally culpable, that it never elicits anything of value – or it could be that it is dirty work that gets results. Rather as in Kathryn Bigelow's Zero Dark Thirty (2012), there is a kind of ambiguity about righteous violence in Prisoners and how exactly we are supposed to feel about it. The film finally effects an evasive blend of condemnation and sentimental exoneration. Perhaps more disconcerting is the way Guzikowski's screenplay has to strain and squirm to tie up all its loose ends, and the film will try your patience with some of the later throwaway revelations. A certain dour realist vigour keeps the nightmare alive.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:


A suspensful thriller with famous and realistic actors. 153 minutes full of thrill, like it should be in a thriller. Nothing more to say, than .....






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Oct. 4, 2013: $43,910,000 (Estimate)
Distributor: Warner Bros.Release Date: September 20, 2013
Genre: Action ThrillerRuntime: 2 hrs. 26 min.
MPAA Rating: RProduction Budget: $46 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com

Insidious: Chapter 2 (2013)

The haunted Lambert family seeks to uncover the mysterious childhood secret that has left them dangerously connected to the spirit world.

 Director:  


Writers: 

(screenplay), (story)

Stars: 





Story:

Hot on the heels of his inexplicably well-received shocker The Conjuring, James Wan's inevitable sequel to Insidious trots out the same old gags with even less panache (not to mention narrative coherence) than before. With Josh (Patrick Wilson) and his tormented family now unsafely ensconced in his mother's house, it's ghost-train showtime once again, replete with ugly dolls, creaky doors, rocking horses, fusey lights and interminable interludes of quiet, quiet, quiet, quiet, bang "scares".
Josh has been to the dark side and brought something back with him – presumably the scripts for Poltergeist, Amityville Horror, The Changeling, The Shining and every other well-worn genre staple that Wan and writer Leigh Whannell merely devour and then regurgitate in bite-sized chunks of second-hand horror spew. Anyone who has ever watched a horror movie will have seen all of this before, but Wan's target audience appears to be people with no interest in the genre, content merely for someone to shout "Boo!" loud enough to distract them momentarily from their mobile phones. Oh, and there's a set-up for a third instalment tacked on to the end. Boo, indeed.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:

Nothing to add to the comment in the story. No new fantasy in the mind of the story writers. All seen and heard and read before. So only a hit in the box office and for hardcore horror fans. For all others only ....






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Oct. 4, 2013: $72,063,000 (Estimate)
Distributor: FilmDistrictRelease Date: September 13, 2013
Genre: HorrorRuntime: 1 hrs. 45 min.
MPAA Rating: PG-13Production Budget: $5 million

Pacific Rim (2013)

As a war between humankind and monstrous sea creatures wages on, a former pilot and a trainee are paired up to drive a seemingly obsolete special weapon in a desperate effort to save the world from the apocalypse.

Director: 


Writers: 

(screenplay), (screenplay)

Stars: 



Story:

The Mexican cinéaste Guillermo del Toro is a brilliant writer, producer and director of horror, fantasy and supernatural movies, one of the most gifted to have emerged in these fields since Tod Browning and James Whale in the 1920s and 30s. His finest films to date have been made in Spain, most notably two subtle gothic fables set during the civil war and its aftermath, The Devil's Backbone and Pan's Labyrinth. But he's also made the highly popular American horror flicks Hellboy and Hellboy II aimed at a younger audience and both starring Ron Perlman as the eponymous comic-book superhero, and his new picture, Pacific Rim, which he co-scripted with Travis Beacham, belongs to this category.
Pacific Rim is a holiday blockbuster, a $180m bag of popcorn as unpretentious as it is expensive, designed, del Toro says, for family outings, his own included. Exactly the same honest claim was made by Richard Burton when explaining, if explanation was needed, why he was making Where Eagles Dare back in the 1960s. He said it was far too long since he'd made a picture that his own children could (or might want to) see. Indeed if you look at the 15 pictures he'd made after Cleopatra (rereleased this week to mark its 50th anniversary), you can see his point. I remember my own children, then aged 10, eight and six lapping up Where Eagles Dare back in 1969, the same year they also loved The Valley of Gwangi, the British monster movie by the great special effects maestro Ray Harryhausen, the co-dedicatee of Pacific Rim along with Ishiro Honda, who made the series of Japanese monster flicks that began in the 1950s with Godzilla and Rodan.
Pacific Rim is a war movie set in a near future that resembles in its combination of high technology with cultural and social dilapidation the grim worlds to come in Alien and Blade Runner. The opening narration tells us that for too long we've been looking to the heavens in awed anticipation of visitors or invaders from above when in fact we should have been keeping an eye on gateways to hell that admit unwanted strangers from below. Some seven years earlier creatures known as Kaiju, the size of tower blocks and far less friendly than King Kong, slipped out of Pacific troughs due to shifting tectonic plates and began setting about states bordering the ocean. Nothing new about this of course. The human response, however, was new. Giant robots known as Jaegers were created, each the size of the Statue of Liberty. They're manned by pairs of operators who need to build a neural bridge between their minds so they can work together in a way that the machine can mimic and replicate in battles against the Kaiju.
After a spectacular fight in which large boats are flung around like corvettes in the Lilliputian navy, the Kaiju appear to be winning, and some years later the Earth is moving to the desperate Plan B, which means investing everything in a giant containing wall around the Pacific rim. We also learn, for those who like moral explanations, that these monsters thrive in our polluted atmosphere, and that they're controlled, as they have been for millennia, by malevolent colonial powers. Then comes that familiar apocalyptic moment when a great leader, a former four-star general, is given "one last chance". Called Stacker Pentecost, his very name is resonant enough to make you shake even without the formidable presence behind it of Idris Elba, shortly to play Nelson Mandela in The Long Walk to Freedom. He's allowed to form a final Jaeger team based in Hong Kong to confront the ever bolder, more ferocious enemy in an ultimate showdown.
He recruits an international team of ace pilots from each edge of the rim, to be led on this do-or-die mission by a Chinese woman, two Australians and an American who's lost his brother in action and has the equally resonant name of Raleigh Becket. All have their own demons to contend with and they're united (and divided) as fathers, sons and daughters. To provide a sort of comic relief there is a pair of dotty scientists on hand (one of them with a gammy leg and called Gottlieb, in honour of Kubrick's Dr Strangelove). Also present is a maverick entrepreneur called Hannibal Chau (played by del Toro regular Ron Perlman), a not unfamiliar science-fiction character who wears gold-plated shoes and collects remnants of the monsters for sale to dubious international clients.
In addition to Blade Runner and Alien, the movie touches several other bases, among them Christopher Nolan's Inception as well as RoboCop, Iron Man and Independence Day. It imitates the last named right down to Stacker Pentecost gathering his band of brothers around him to deliver an uplifting prose version of King Harry's eve of Agincourt speech, which, as a result of Laurence Olivier's Henry V, is forever associated with D-day in 1944 by my now dwindling generation.
Del Toro generally manages to keep triumphalism at bay, avoids solemnity, gives each nation a fair share of the limelight and cheerfully embraces the mock seriousness that such films insist on. He also plants a little joke halfway through the final credits both to reward the few people who haven't removed their 3D glasses and left the cinema, and to let them know that a sequel is a strong possibility. He has been greatly helped in the project by his regular cinematographer Guillermo Navarro and the excellent production designer Andrew Neskoromny, both of them highly experienced in this genre.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:


A nice science fiction movie with sympatic main actors. It is not a very groundbreaking story, but basically an interesting and entertaining storyline. Never thougt to look to my watch during the 130 minutes. 
So my facit ...






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Oct. 3, 2013: $101,665,095
Distributor: Warner Bros.Release Date: July 12, 2013
Genre: Sci-Fi ActionRuntime: 2 hrs. 11 min.
MPAA Rating: PG-13Production Budget: $190 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Paranoia (2013)

An entry-level employee at a powerful corporation finds himself occupying a corner office, but at a dangerous price: he must spy on his boss's old mentor to secure for him a multi-billion dollar advantage.

Director:  


Writers: 

(screenplay), (screenplay)

Stars: 

, , Harrison Ford



Story:

In this high-stakes thriller, Adam Cassidy (Liam Hemsworth) is a regular guy trying to get ahead in his entry-level job at Wyatt Corporation. But after one costly mistake, Adam's ruthless CEO, Nicholas Wyatt (Gary Oldman), forces him to spy on corporate rival, Jock Goddard (Harrison Ford), Wyatt's old mentor. Adam soon finds himself occupying the corner office and living the life of his dreams. However, behind the scenes, he is simply a pawn in Wyatt's corporate game and realizes he must ultimately find a way out from under his boss who will stop at nothing, even murder, to win a multi-billion dollar advantage.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:


Famous actors and great names are no guaranty for a great thriller movie. And this has happend in this film. One dialog after another, one scene after another but no continous story. So there is a confusing and unbeliveable movie with famous names and nothing more.






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Sep. 29, 2013: $7,376,027
Distributor: RelativityRelease Date: August 16, 2013
Genre: ThrillerRuntime: 1 hrs. 55 min.
MPAA Rating: PG-13Production Budget: $35 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com

Rush (2013)

A re-creation of the merciless 1970s rivalry between Formula One rivals James Hunt and Niki Lauda.

Director: 


Writer: 

(screenplay)

Stars: 





Story:

No matter how obsessed we continue to be with the 1970s, there's always one more myth left to excavate, and this very entertaining and well-made motor racing movie from director Ron Howard and screenwriter Peter Morgan brings us a meaty tale from 1976: a story of antler-clashing, engine-revving alpha-males. This was a year in which not everyone in fact was obsessed with the release of the Sex Pistols' Anarchy in the UK. In the profoundly conservative world of Formula One, millions of TV viewers were increasingly preoccupied with an extraordinary duel developing between two drivers: the glamorous swashbuckler from Britain, James Hunt, and the icily correct Austrian Niki Lauda.
Hunt is played by the Australian star Chris Hemsworth, his shampooed mane swishing and shirt permanently open, enjoying the birds and the clubs – the Rod Stewart of the race world. He's shown swigging champers and taking a cheeky puff of weed before climbing into the car, rather in the way athletes of an earlier era trained on fish and chips. Meanwhile, the scowling Lauda, rat-faced and jealous of Hunt's joie de vivre, notes how the Brit might get sloppy, undisciplined – and beaten over the championship long haul. He is shrewdly and sympathetically played by Daniel Brühl with a clipped Viennese voice, which reminded me oddly of England's ex-manager Steve McClaren and his Dutch accent.
The Freud-cigar-shaped luxury speed monsters are the centre of their worlds. In the ecstatic words of Hunt's original team manager, Alexander Hesketh (Christian McKay), shouting above the track's roar: "Men love women – but even more than that, men love CARS!" You'd probably have to rewatch Derek Jarman's Sebastiane to find something less heterosexual than that. Yet both men have beautiful wives. Olivia Wilde plays Suzy Miller, whose rock-chick style fits Hunt's image, and Alexandra Maria Lara has the rather stodgier role of Lauda's wife Marlene Knaus, permanently worried and disapproving.
The sport, and to some extent this movie, is about risk. In those days, there was a horribly high chance that any driver would get killed. Hunt and Lauda's face-off is like the confrontation of wartime flying aces: there is low life expectancy, yet they are not competing for national honour but specious glamour and cash. In fact, Hemsworth's Hunt is like George Peppard in The Blue Max, while Brühl's Lauda is closer to Douglas Bader. While Hunt just swaggers around, uncaring, uncomprehending, it is Lauda who can see the downside. It is Lauda who can see that he has grownup responsibilities outside the track; he must face looking like a wimp or even a coward by declining to race in such circumstances. But despite all his caution, it is Lauda who pays an awful price.
Interestingly, Howard's Rush coincides with the revival of Roman Polanski's 1972 documentary Weekend of a Champion about Jackie Stewart, a film that gives a much clearer idea of the boredom involved in being a racer: watching, waiting, worrying about the engine and above all agonising about the weather like a farmer. A recent BBC documentary, Hunt Vs Lauda: F1's Greatest Racing Rivals in fact told a more complicated story about team competition, rather than simply the clash of egos.
So what does it all add up to? Well, it's another reminder of how sporting stars had stronger personalities in those days. Perhaps Howard will now want to reunite Hemsworth and Brühl to replay the Stan Smith/Ilie Na˘stase Wimbledon final. But on the face of it, Morgan's screenplay does not seem to have as much at stake as his other works. Hunt/Lauda does not have the same resonance as Frost/Nixon.
Or does it? Hunt famously abandoned the rigours of motor-racing soon after that year and turned to business projects, to enjoying life and to having a bit of a laugh on the telly. His spiritual descendants are all too clearly a certain trio of car-mad television presenters. Meanwhile, Lauda is shown to be baffled and disapproving at Hunt's attitude. He carries on with racing and the discipline, zooming round and round in circles, despite the terrible thing that happened to him. So which was the champ and which was the chump? We affect to adore dilettantes with their (apparently) squandered talents: the Peter Cooks and the George Bests, and yet in claiming to admire them, we are suppressing a secret twinge at the sad and wasteful side of their lives, while appreciating the warning lesson. But then professional careers are everything to those in the developed world, even more so in the chill of a recession: maybe we are all Niki Laudas now, plugging sternly on. There is something amiable and unaffected in the way Howard's film refuses to decide which of the two was the winner.


Trailer:




Movie Rating (max. 5 Stars):




Summary:

It was a little bit before I was interested in F1 sport. When it began my age was about 3 years, but I am from Austria, so I grow up with an idol called Niki Lauda. And therefore it is nearly impossible to make a bad movie about one of my early youth idols. And against other biographic movies, this film is full of action and suspens like it was in reality. So, as an real Austrian, there are only 5 stars possible and a big .....






Box Office:


Domestic Total as of Sep. 29, 2013: $10,275,829
Distributor: UniversalRelease Date: September 20, 2013
Genre: Action DramaRuntime: 2 hrs. 3 min.
MPAA Rating: RProduction Budget: $38 million


Reverences:

www.imbd.com
www.theguardian.com
www.youtube.com
www.boxofficemojo.com